MiMo (Xiaomi) Pricing
All plans and pricing as of 2026-10-29
Free (consumer)
- ✓Xiaomi consumer device integration (HyperOS, Mi AI)
- ✓Web chat at mimo.xiaomi.com
- ✓Basic usage limits apply
API (MiMo-V2.6-Pro)
- ✓1.02T total / 42B active MoE; text, image, video and audio input; 1M context
- ✓Cache-hit input $0.0036 per 1M tokens; cache writes free for a limited time
- ✓One price across the full 1M context in Xiaomi's V2.6 price table
- ✓Pro-UltraSpeed mode: up to 20x output speed at $4.35 input / $8.7 output per 1M tokens
- ✓OpenAI- and Anthropic-API-compatible endpoints (the standard pattern Chinese frontier models adopted in 2025-26)
- ✓Token Plan available for predictable high-volume use
API (MiMo-V2.6-Flash)
- ✓309B total / 15B active MoE with the same omnimodal input and 1M context as Pro
- ✓Cache-hit input $0.0028 per 1M tokens
- ✓About a third of Pro's price; vendor-reported DeepSWE v1.1 67.9 vs 71.9 for Pro
Self-hosted MiMo-V2.6 (MIT open weights)
- ✓Pro and Flash weights on Hugging Face and ModelScope, as RL and MOPD checkpoints
- ✓MOPD checkpoints (2026-09-27) mitigate tool-call repetition in agent loops
- ✓MiMo-V2.6-Distill-Qwen-9B: a 9B SFT checkpoint on Qwen3.5-9B for agentic RL research
- ✓Technical report, training environments and RL code released
MiMo-V2.5-TTS (3 sub-models)
- ✓Base TTS (general voice synthesis)
- ✓VoiceDesign (designed-from-scratch synthetic voices)
- ✓VoiceClone (replicate a target voice from a sample)
MiMo-V2.5-ASR (open-source)
- ✓Open-source under the MIT licence (Hugging Face, 2026-04-23)
- ✓English + Mandarin Chinese + major Chinese dialects (Cantonese, Shanghainese, etc.)
- ✓Self-hostable for privacy-sensitive transcription workloads
Is MiMo (Xiaomi) Worth the Price?
Value Score: 9/10
Overall Score: 8.3/10 · Teams building voice-first agentic products that need a coordinated reasoning + TTS + ASR stack from a single vendor. Also Chinese-market builders and developers who need strong multimodal (vision + audio) inputs in one API call without stitching three providers together. MiMo-V2.6-Pro's single price across 1M context suits long-document agentic workloads, and its MIT open weights suit teams that want to self-host a flagship-class omnimodal model.
MiMo is Xiaomi treating voice as a first-class agentic surface, not an after-the-fact integration. Shipping V2.5 Pro + Multimodal + TTS + open-source ASR together -- with native vision and audio reasoning baked into the flagship and the 1M-context surcharge removed -- is the most coordinated voice-stack launch from a Chinese frontier vendor in 2026. MiMo-V2.6 (September 2026) adds MIT open weights for Pro and Flash at unchanged API prices, and Xiaomi's own tables put V2.6-Pro near Claude Opus 5 on several agent benchmarks while trailing on Terminal Bench 4.0 and exploit tasks. Treat MiMo as a serious option for voice-pipeline builds, multimodal Chinese-language workloads, low-cost agentic API use, self-hosted open-weight deployments, and dialect-strong ASR. For text-only English-first work, Claude / GPT / Gemini still lead and DeepSeek is still the cheapest text-first frontier alternative.
The Tier List Tuesday
Weekly newsletter: tier movers, new entrants, and the VS of the week. Built from our daily AI-tool sweeps. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
How MiMo (Xiaomi) Pricing Compares
| Tool | Free Tier | Starting Price | Value Score | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiMo (Xiaomi)(this tool) | Yes | $0 | 9/10 | 8.3 |
| Muse Spark + Muse Wonder (Meta) | Yes | $0 | 9/10 | 8.8 |
| Claude (Anthropic) | Yes | $0 | 8/10 | 8.5 |
| Gemini (Google) | Yes | $2 / $10/per 1M tokens (input/output) through 2026-11-30; $4 / $20 from 2026-12-01 | 9/10 | 8.3 |
| Tencent Hy3 / Hy4 preview (formerly Hunyuan) | Yes | $0 | 9.5/10 | 8.1 |
| Grok | Yes | $0 | 7.5/10 | 7.5 |