Qwen (Alibaba) vs Grammarly
Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.
Qwen (Alibaba)
Alibaba's open-weights family -- Qwen3.5, Qwen3-Coder-Next, Qwen3-VL, Qwen3-Max. Apache 2.0 flagship sizes.
Grammarly
AI writing assistant that catches errors everywhere you type -- now with full AI rewriting
| Category | Qwen (Alibaba) | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 7.0 | 10.0 |
| Output Quality | 9.0 | 7.0 |
| Value | 10.0 | 7.0 |
| Features | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Overall | 8.8 | 8.0 |
Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Qwen (Alibaba) | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | $0 | $0 |
Benchmark Head-to-Head
Qwen3.5-397B MoE benchmarks — Grammarly has no published benchmarks
| Benchmark | Description | Score |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | Harder multi-subject reasoning | 83.5% |
| GPQA Diamond | Graduate-level science questions | 78.2% |
| AIME 2025 | 87% | |
| HumanEval | Python code generation | 92.5% |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 69.4% |
Which Should You Pick?
Pick Qwen (Alibaba) if...
- ✓Higher output quality (9 vs 7)
- ✓Better value for money (10/10)
- ✓More features (9 vs 8)
Developers who want frontier-tier open weights with Apache 2.0 licensing. Qwen3-Coder-Next is arguably the best local coding model; Qwen3.5-397B is a top-3 open generalist.
Visit Qwen (Alibaba)Pick Grammarly if...
- ✓Easier to use (10 vs 7)
Non-native English speakers, professionals who write lots of emails, and anyone who wants a passive grammar net running in the background. It catches things you'd miss.
Visit GrammarlyOur Verdict
Qwen (Alibaba) edges out Grammarly with a 8.8 vs 8.0 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Qwen (Alibaba) has the advantage in output quality.