Qwen (Alibaba) vs Google Antigravity

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

Qwen (Alibaba)

A
8.8/10

Alibaba's open-weights family -- Qwen3.5, Qwen3-Coder-Next, Qwen3-VL, Qwen3-Max. Apache 2.0 flagship sizes.

Google Antigravity

A
8.0/10

Google's agent-first AI IDE -- deploys up to 5 autonomous coding agents in parallel on a VS Code fork

Powered by Gemini 3.1 Pro / Claude Opus 4.6 / GPT-OSS 120B (multi-model)

CategoryQwen (Alibaba)Google Antigravity
Ease of Use7.08.0
Output Quality9.08.5
Value10.06.0
Features9.09.5
Overall8.88.0

Pricing Comparison

FeatureQwen (Alibaba)Google Antigravity
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Qwen3.5-397B MoE benchmarks — Google Antigravity has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU-Pro83.5%
GPQA Diamond78.2%
AIME 202587%
HumanEval92.5%
SWE-Bench Verified69.4%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Qwen (Alibaba) if...

  • Better value for money (10/10)

Developers who want frontier-tier open weights with Apache 2.0 licensing. Qwen3-Coder-Next is arguably the best local coding model; Qwen3.5-397B is a top-3 open generalist.

Visit Qwen (Alibaba)

Pick Google Antigravity if...

  • Easier to use (8 vs 7)

Developers working on large, multi-file projects who want to parallelize their workflow. If you regularly work on 3-5 tasks simultaneously (fix a bug, add a feature, write tests, refactor), Antigravity's multi-agent architecture is unmatched.

Visit Google Antigravity

Our Verdict

Qwen (Alibaba) edges out Google Antigravity with a 8.8 vs 8.0 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Qwen (Alibaba) has the advantage in output quality.