Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Gemini (Google)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

A
8.9/10

Google's Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model -- the best-in-class text-in-image renderer, now the default across the Gemini app

Gemini (Google)

A
8.3/10

Google's LLM with deep Google Workspace integration, 2M token context window, and native code execution

CategoryNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Gemini (Google)
Ease of Use9.58.0
Output Quality9.58.0
Value8.59.0
Features8.08.0
Overall8.98.3

Pricing Comparison

FeatureNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Gemini (Google)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Gemini 3.1 Ultra benchmarks — Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU90.5%
GPQA Diamond94.3%
HumanEval93.5%
SWE-bench80.6%
ARC-AGI77.1%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) if...

  • Higher output quality (9.5 vs 8)
  • Easier to use (9.5 vs 8)

Designers, marketers, and content creators who need readable text in images (social posts, ad creative, book covers, infographics, event flyers) and who are already using or willing to pay for Gemini. If any part of your commercial design work requires typography to look right, Nano Banana 2 is the 2026 leader.

Visit Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Pick Gemini (Google) if...

Google Workspace power users. If you live in Gmail, Docs, and Drive, Gemini Advanced integrates directly into your workflow. Also great for developers who need the cheapest API with the longest context window.

Visit Gemini (Google)

Our Verdict

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) edges out Gemini (Google) with a 8.9 vs 8.3 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has the advantage in output quality.