Gemini (Google) vs Qwen (Alibaba)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Gemini (Google)

A
8.3/10

Google's LLM with deep Google Workspace integration, 2M token context window, and native code execution

Our Pick

Qwen (Alibaba)

A
8.8/10

Alibaba's open-weights family -- Qwen3.5, Qwen3-Coder-Next, Qwen3-VL, Qwen3-Max. Apache 2.0 flagship sizes.

CategoryGemini (Google)Qwen (Alibaba)
Ease of Use8.07.0
Output Quality8.09.0
Value9.010.0
Features8.09.0
Overall8.38.8

Pricing Comparison

FeatureGemini (Google)Qwen (Alibaba)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Gemini 3.1 Ultra vs Qwen3.5-397B MoE

BenchmarkGemini (Google)Qwen (Alibaba)
GPQA Diamond94.3%78.2%
HumanEval93.5%92.5%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Gemini (Google) if...

  • Easier to use (8 vs 7)
  • Stronger on graduate-level science questions (+16.1% on GPQA Diamond)

Google Workspace power users. If you live in Gmail, Docs, and Drive, Gemini Advanced integrates directly into your workflow. Also great for developers who need the cheapest API with the longest context window.

Visit Gemini (Google)

Pick Qwen (Alibaba) if...

  • Higher output quality (9 vs 8)
  • Better value for money (10/10)
  • More features (9 vs 8)

Developers who want frontier-tier open weights with Apache 2.0 licensing. Qwen3-Coder-Next is arguably the best local coding model; Qwen3.5-397B is a top-3 open generalist.

Visit Qwen (Alibaba)

Our Verdict

Qwen (Alibaba) edges out Gemini (Google) with a 8.8 vs 8.3 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Qwen (Alibaba) has the advantage in output quality.