Llama 4 (Meta) vs GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Llama 4 (Meta)

B
7.9/10

Meta's open-weights flagship family -- Scout (10M context), Maverick (multimodal 400B MoE), Behemoth in preview

Our Pick

GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)

A
8.0/10

Zhipu AI's open-weights family -- GLM-4.6 text flagship and GLM-4.6V multimodal, true MIT licensed

CategoryLlama 4 (Meta)GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)
Ease of Use5.06.5
Output Quality8.58.5
Value9.09.0
Features9.08.0
Overall7.98.0

Pricing Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 (Meta)GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Llama 4 Maverick (17B/400B MoE) vs GLM-4.6

BenchmarkLlama 4 (Meta)GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)
MMLU-Pro80.5%81.2%
GPQA Diamond69.8%74.5%
HumanEval88%89.1%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Llama 4 (Meta) if...

  • More features (9 vs 8)

Developers and teams who need a permissively-licensed open-weights model with strong tooling, long context (Scout), or multimodal (Maverick). Safe default choice given the ecosystem.

Visit Llama 4 (Meta)

Pick GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI) if...

  • Easier to use (6.5 vs 5)
  • Stronger on graduate-level science questions (+4.7% on GPQA Diamond)

Teams that need genuine MIT-licensed frontier open weights with no commercial strings. Especially strong for agentic workflows and vision (GLM-4.6V).

Visit GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)

Our Verdict

Llama 4 (Meta) and GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI) are extremely close overall. Your choice comes down to specific needs -- Llama 4 (Meta) is better for developers and teams who need a permissively-licensed open-weights model with strong tooling, long context (scout), or multimodal (maverick), while GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI) works best for teams that need genuine mit-licensed frontier open weights with no commercial strings.