GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI) vs Qwen (Alibaba)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)

A
8.0/10

Zhipu AI's open-weights family -- GLM-4.6 text flagship and GLM-4.6V multimodal, true MIT licensed

Our Pick

Qwen (Alibaba)

A
8.8/10

Alibaba's open-weights family -- Qwen3.5, Qwen3-Coder-Next, Qwen3-VL, Qwen3-Max. Apache 2.0 flagship sizes.

CategoryGLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)Qwen (Alibaba)
Ease of Use6.57.0
Output Quality8.59.0
Value9.010.0
Features8.09.0
Overall8.08.8

Pricing Comparison

FeatureGLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)Qwen (Alibaba)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3.5-397B MoE

BenchmarkGLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)Qwen (Alibaba)
MMLU-Pro81.2%83.5%
GPQA Diamond74.5%78.2%
HumanEval89.1%92.5%
SWE-Bench Verified64.2%69.4%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI) if...

Teams that need genuine MIT-licensed frontier open weights with no commercial strings. Especially strong for agentic workflows and vision (GLM-4.6V).

Visit GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)

Pick Qwen (Alibaba) if...

  • Better value for money (10/10)
  • More features (9 vs 8)
  • Stronger on (+5.2% on SWE-Bench Verified)

Developers who want frontier-tier open weights with Apache 2.0 licensing. Qwen3-Coder-Next is arguably the best local coding model; Qwen3.5-397B is a top-3 open generalist.

Visit Qwen (Alibaba)

Our Verdict

Qwen (Alibaba) edges out GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI) with a 8.8 vs 8.0 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Qwen (Alibaba) has the advantage in output quality.