Our pickGLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)
Poe
Tier-list head-to-head. GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI) takes the A-tier slot — here's the breakdown.
Spec sheet
| GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | Poe | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | A-tierwin | B-tier |
| Overall score | 8.0 / 10win | 7.5 / 10 |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Best for | Teams that need genuine MIT-licensed frontier open weights with no commercial strings. | AI power users who want to try multiple models without managing separate subscriptions for each one. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-17 | 2026-03-27 |
Head-to-head
Rated 1-10 on the same rubric across all 130 tools we cover.
Vibe check
How each tool actually sounds when you talk to it.
“The Z.ai research model”
“The multi-model switchboard”
What you'll pay
Look past the headline number -- entry-tier limits drive most cost surprises.
Free tier available
Free tier available
GLM-5.1 (744B MoE / 40B active) benchmarks — Poe has no published benchmarks
| Benchmark | Description | Score |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-Bench Pro | 58.4% | |
| MMLU-Pro | Harder multi-subject reasoning | 81.2% |
| GPQA Diamond | Graduate-level science questions | 74.5% |
| HumanEval | Python code generation | 89.1% |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 64.2% | |
| BFCL (function calling) | 88% |
The decision
Use-case anchors and category strengths, side by side.
Teams that need genuine MIT-licensed frontier open weights with no commercial strings. Especially strong for agentic workflows and vision (GLM-4.6V).
Visit GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)AI power users who want to try multiple models without managing separate subscriptions for each one.
Visit PoeBottom line
GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI) edges out Poe by 0.5 points (8.0 vs 7.5) -- a A-tier vs B-tier split that's narrow but real. Not a blowout; both belong on a shortlist. The score gap shows up most clearly in the categories that matter for GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)'s strengths, so if those categories are your priority, the lead translates.
Pricing-wise, both tools have a free tier (GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI) starts $0, Poe starts $0), so you can test either without committing. Compare what each free tier actually unlocks -- usage caps, model access, and feature gates differ a lot more than the headline price suggests, especially as both vendors have tightened limits in 2026.
By use case: pick GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI) when teams that need genuine mit-licensed frontier open weights with no commercial strings. Pick Poe when ai power users who want to try multiple models without managing separate subscriptions for each one. The two tools aren't fighting for the same person -- they're aiming at adjacent jobs that occasionally overlap. If you're squarely in GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI)'s lane, the tier-list ranking and the use-case fit point the same direction; if you're in Poe's lane, the score gap matters less than the fit.
Bottom line: GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI) is the safer default for most readers, but Poe is competitive enough that the tie-breaker is your specific workload, not the spec sheet.
Keep digging
Full GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI) review
Tier A · 8.0/10
Full Poe review
Tier B · 7.5/10
GLM / Z.ai (Zhipu AI) alternatives
Other tools in this lane
Poe alternatives
Other tools in this lane
Built from our daily AI-tool sweep, last touched April 17, 2026. Honest tier-list reviews — no affiliate-link pieces disguised as advice. See the rubric or how we review.