Gemma 4 (Google) vs Qwen (Alibaba)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Gemma 4 (Google)

A
8.3/10

Google DeepMind's open-weights model family -- multimodal, 256K context, runs on edge devices

Our Pick

Qwen (Alibaba)

A
8.8/10

Alibaba's open-weights family -- Qwen3.5, Qwen3-Coder-Next, Qwen3-VL, Qwen3-Max. Apache 2.0 flagship sizes.

CategoryGemma 4 (Google)Qwen (Alibaba)
Ease of Use7.07.0
Output Quality8.09.0
Value10.010.0
Features8.09.0
Overall8.38.8

Pricing Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 (Google)Qwen (Alibaba)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.5-397B MoE

BenchmarkGemma 4 (Google)Qwen (Alibaba)
GPQA Diamond84.3%78.2%
HumanEval85%92.5%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Gemma 4 (Google) if...

  • Stronger on graduate-level science questions (+6.1% on GPQA Diamond)

Developers and businesses who need a permissively licensed multimodal LLM they can self-host or fine-tune. Especially good for multilingual use cases and on-device deployment.

Visit Gemma 4 (Google)

Pick Qwen (Alibaba) if...

  • Higher output quality (9 vs 8)
  • More features (9 vs 8)
  • Stronger on python code generation (+7.5% on HumanEval)

Developers who want frontier-tier open weights with Apache 2.0 licensing. Qwen3-Coder-Next is arguably the best local coding model; Qwen3.5-397B is a top-3 open generalist.

Visit Qwen (Alibaba)

Our Verdict

Qwen (Alibaba) edges out Gemma 4 (Google) with a 8.8 vs 8.3 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Qwen (Alibaba) has the advantage in output quality.