Gemma 4 (Google) vs Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Gemma 4 (Google)

A
8.3/10

Google DeepMind's open-weights model family -- multimodal, 256K context, runs on edge devices

Our Pick

Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0

A
8.4/10

Microsoft's MIT-licensed open-source agent orchestration framework -- GA on 2026-04-03. Merges Semantic Kernel and AutoGen into a single SDK. Python and .NET. Native MCP and A2A protocol support. Connectors for Foundry, Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Claude, Bedrock, Gemini, Ollama

CategoryGemma 4 (Google)Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0
Ease of Use7.06.0
Output Quality8.08.5
Value10.010.0
Features8.09.0
Overall8.38.4

Pricing Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 (Google)Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Gemma 4 31B benchmarks — Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU83%
GPQA Diamond84.3%
AIME 202689.2%
HumanEval85%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Gemma 4 (Google) if...

  • Easier to use (7 vs 6)

Developers and businesses who need a permissively licensed multimodal LLM they can self-host or fine-tune. Especially good for multilingual use cases and on-device deployment.

Visit Gemma 4 (Google)

Pick Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 if...

  • More features (9 vs 8)

Enterprise developers on .NET or mixed Python + .NET stacks who want an MIT-licensed agent orchestration framework with real enterprise credibility. Also good for Azure Foundry customers who want first-class native integration. Teams migrating from Semantic Kernel or AutoGen should plan the move to Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 now rather than later.

Visit Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0

Our Verdict

Gemma 4 (Google) and Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 are extremely close overall. Your choice comes down to specific needs -- Gemma 4 (Google) is better for developers and businesses who need a permissively licensed multimodal llm they can self-host or fine-tune, while Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 works best for enterprise developers on .