Gemma 4 (Google) vs Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

Gemma 4 (Google)

A
8.3/10

Google DeepMind's open-weights model family -- multimodal, 256K context, runs on edge devices

Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1

B
7.9/10

Microsoft's first in-house speech-recognition model -- launched 2026-04-02. #1 on FLEURS WER overall, #1 by FLEURS WER in 11 of the top 25 global languages. Beats Whisper-large-v3, Scribe v2, GPT-Transcribe, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite. $0.36/hour of audio on Azure Foundry

CategoryGemma 4 (Google)Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1
Ease of Use7.06.0
Output Quality8.09.5
Value10.09.0
Features8.07.0
Overall8.37.9

Pricing Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 (Google)Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0.36

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Gemma 4 31B benchmarks — Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1 has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU83%
GPQA Diamond84.3%
AIME 202689.2%
HumanEval85%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Gemma 4 (Google) if...

  • Easier to use (7 vs 6)
  • Better value for money (10/10)
  • More features (8 vs 7)

Developers and businesses who need a permissively licensed multimodal LLM they can self-host or fine-tune. Especially good for multilingual use cases and on-device deployment.

Visit Gemma 4 (Google)

Pick Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1 if...

  • Higher output quality (9.5 vs 8)

Developers and enterprises who need best-in-class multilingual speech-to-text for high-volume use cases (meeting recording pipelines, call-center transcription, accessibility captioning at scale, multilingual audio indexing). Especially relevant for Azure shops already on Microsoft infrastructure.

Visit Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1

Our Verdict

Gemma 4 (Google) edges out Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1 with a 8.3 vs 7.9 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Gemma 4 (Google) has the advantage in value.