Gemma 4 (Google) vs IBM Granite 4.0

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

Gemma 4 (Google)

A
8.3/10

Google DeepMind's open-weights model family -- multimodal, 256K context, runs on edge devices

IBM Granite 4.0

A
8.2/10

IBM's enterprise-focused open-weight family -- Granite 4.0 hybrid Mamba-2 + transformer architecture (70-80% memory reduction vs pure transformer), 3B to 32B sizes, Apache 2.0. First open model family to secure ISO 42001 certification. Nano 350M runs on CPU with 8-16GB RAM. 3B Vision variant landed 2026-04-01

CategoryGemma 4 (Google)IBM Granite 4.0
Ease of Use7.07.0
Output Quality8.08.0
Value10.09.5
Features8.08.5
Overall8.38.2

Pricing Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 (Google)IBM Granite 4.0
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Gemma 4 31B benchmarks — IBM Granite 4.0 has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU83%
GPQA Diamond84.3%
AIME 202689.2%
HumanEval85%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Gemma 4 (Google) if...

Developers and businesses who need a permissively licensed multimodal LLM they can self-host or fine-tune. Especially good for multilingual use cases and on-device deployment.

Visit Gemma 4 (Google)

Pick IBM Granite 4.0 if...

Regulated-industry enterprises (healthcare, finance, government) who need Apache 2.0 open-weight models with ISO 42001 certification. Also ideal for edge deployments where Granite Nano (350M / 1.5B) is one of the few open models that runs realistically on CPU. And for any Mamba-hybrid research or low-memory production use where the 70-80% memory reduction actually changes the economics.

Visit IBM Granite 4.0

Our Verdict

Gemma 4 (Google) and IBM Granite 4.0 are extremely close overall. Your choice comes down to specific needs -- Gemma 4 (Google) is better for developers and businesses who need a permissively licensed multimodal llm they can self-host or fine-tune, while IBM Granite 4.0 works best for regulated-industry enterprises (healthcare, finance, government) who need apache 2.