Gemma 4 (Google) vs Codex (OpenAI)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

Gemma 4 (Google)

A
8.3/10

Google DeepMind's open-weights model family -- multimodal, 256K context, runs on edge devices

Codex (OpenAI)

A
8.3/10

OpenAI's cloud-based coding agent -- runs parallel tasks, proposes PRs, and lives inside ChatGPT

Powered by GPT-5.3-Codex / GPT-5.4

CategoryGemma 4 (Google)Codex (OpenAI)
Ease of Use7.08.0
Output Quality8.08.0
Value10.08.0
Features8.09.0
Overall8.38.3

Pricing Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 (Google)Codex (OpenAI)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Gemma 4 31B vs GPT-5.3-Codex

BenchmarkGemma 4 (Google)Codex (OpenAI)
HumanEval85%95%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Gemma 4 (Google) if...

  • Better value for money (10/10)

Developers and businesses who need a permissively licensed multimodal LLM they can self-host or fine-tune. Especially good for multilingual use cases and on-device deployment.

Visit Gemma 4 (Google)

Pick Codex (OpenAI) if...

  • Easier to use (8 vs 7)
  • More features (9 vs 8)
  • Stronger on python code generation (+10.0% on HumanEval)

Developers already paying for ChatGPT Plus who want a coding agent at no extra cost. Especially good for parallel task execution -- assign multiple bug fixes or feature branches and let Codex work them simultaneously.

Visit Codex (OpenAI)

Our Verdict

Gemma 4 (Google) and Codex (OpenAI) are extremely close overall. Your choice comes down to specific needs -- Gemma 4 (Google) is better for developers and businesses who need a permissively licensed multimodal llm they can self-host or fine-tune, while Codex (OpenAI) works best for developers already paying for chatgpt plus who want a coding agent at no extra cost.