Gemma 4 (Google) vs Google Antigravity
Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.
Gemma 4 (Google)
Google DeepMind's open-weights model family -- multimodal, 256K context, runs on edge devices
Google Antigravity
Google's agent-first AI IDE -- deploys up to 5 autonomous coding agents in parallel on a VS Code fork
Powered by Gemini 3.1 Pro / Claude Opus 4.6 / GPT-OSS 120B (multi-model)
| Category | Gemma 4 (Google) | Google Antigravity |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| Output Quality | 8.0 | 8.5 |
| Value | 10.0 | 6.0 |
| Features | 8.0 | 9.5 |
| Overall | 8.3 | 8.0 |
Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Gemma 4 (Google) | Google Antigravity |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | $0 | $0 |
Benchmark Head-to-Head
Gemma 4 31B benchmarks — Google Antigravity has no published benchmarks
| Benchmark | Description | Score |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | Knowledge across 57 subjects | 83% |
| GPQA Diamond | Graduate-level science questions | 84.3% |
| AIME 2024 | Competition math problems | 89.2% |
| HumanEval | Python code generation | 85% |
Which Should You Pick?
Pick Gemma 4 (Google) if...
- ✓Better value for money (10/10)
Developers and businesses who need a permissively licensed multimodal LLM they can self-host or fine-tune. Especially good for multilingual use cases and on-device deployment.
Visit Gemma 4 (Google)Pick Google Antigravity if...
- ✓Easier to use (8 vs 7)
- ✓More features (9.5 vs 8)
Developers working on large, multi-file projects who want to parallelize their workflow. If you regularly work on 3-5 tasks simultaneously (fix a bug, add a feature, write tests, refactor), Antigravity's multi-agent architecture is unmatched.
Visit Google AntigravityOur Verdict
Gemma 4 (Google) edges out Google Antigravity with a 8.3 vs 8.0 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Gemma 4 (Google) has the advantage in value.