Falcon (TII) vs Qwen (Alibaba)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Falcon (TII)

B
7.1/10

UAE's Technology Innovation Institute open-weights family -- Falcon 3 optimized for efficient sub-10B deployment on consumer hardware

Our Pick

Qwen (Alibaba)

A
8.8/10

Alibaba's open-weights family -- Qwen3.5, Qwen3-Coder-Next, Qwen3-VL, Qwen3-Max. Apache 2.0 flagship sizes.

CategoryFalcon (TII)Qwen (Alibaba)
Ease of Use7.07.0
Output Quality6.59.0
Value9.010.0
Features6.09.0
Overall7.18.8

Pricing Comparison

FeatureFalcon (TII)Qwen (Alibaba)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Falcon 3 10B vs Qwen3.5-397B MoE

BenchmarkFalcon (TII)Qwen (Alibaba)
GPQA Diamond42.5%78.2%
HumanEval73.8%92.5%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Falcon (TII) if...

Developers who need a genuinely Apache-2.0 small model for on-device or edge deployment, or who need strong Arabic/multilingual support.

Visit Falcon (TII)

Pick Qwen (Alibaba) if...

  • Higher output quality (9 vs 6.5)
  • Better value for money (10/10)
  • More features (9 vs 6)
  • Stronger on graduate-level science questions (+35.7% on GPQA Diamond)

Developers who want frontier-tier open weights with Apache 2.0 licensing. Qwen3-Coder-Next is arguably the best local coding model; Qwen3.5-397B is a top-3 open generalist.

Visit Qwen (Alibaba)

Our Verdict

Qwen (Alibaba) is the clear winner here with 8.8/10 vs 7.1/10. Falcon (TII) isn't bad, but Qwen (Alibaba) outperforms it across the board. Pick Falcon (TII) only if developers who need a genuinely apache-2.