DeepSeek vs Qwen (Alibaba)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

DeepSeek

A
8.0/10

Near-frontier reasoning for pennies on the dollar -- the open-source LLM that made Silicon Valley nervous

Our Pick

Qwen (Alibaba)

A
8.8/10

Alibaba's open-weights family -- Qwen3.5, Qwen3-Coder-Next, Qwen3-VL, Qwen3-Max. Apache 2.0 flagship sizes.

CategoryDeepSeekQwen (Alibaba)
Ease of Use7.57.0
Output Quality8.09.0
Value9.510.0
Features7.09.0
Overall8.08.8

Pricing Comparison

FeatureDeepSeekQwen (Alibaba)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-397B MoE

BenchmarkDeepSeekQwen (Alibaba)
MMLU-Pro85%83.5%
GPQA Diamond79.9%78.2%
HumanEval91.5%92.5%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick DeepSeek if...

  • Stronger on graduate-level science questions (+1.7% on GPQA Diamond)

Developers and teams who need strong reasoning and coding capabilities on a budget. If you're building AI features and can't justify GPT-4 API costs, DeepSeek is the obvious first stop.

Visit DeepSeek

Pick Qwen (Alibaba) if...

  • Higher output quality (9 vs 8)
  • More features (9 vs 7)
  • Stronger on python code generation (+1.0% on HumanEval)

Developers who want frontier-tier open weights with Apache 2.0 licensing. Qwen3-Coder-Next is arguably the best local coding model; Qwen3.5-397B is a top-3 open generalist.

Visit Qwen (Alibaba)

Our Verdict

Qwen (Alibaba) edges out DeepSeek with a 8.8 vs 8.0 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Qwen (Alibaba) has the advantage in output quality.