Cohere Command A vs Falcon (TII)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

Cohere Command A

B
7.5/10

Cohere's enterprise-multilingual flagship -- 111B params, 256K context, runs on 2x H100. 23 languages. CC-BY-NC 4.0 on weights (research / non-commercial), commercial requires Cohere enterprise contract. Follow-ups: Command A Reasoning + Command A Vision

Falcon (TII)

B
7.1/10

UAE's Technology Innovation Institute open-weights family -- Falcon 3 optimized for efficient sub-10B deployment on consumer hardware

CategoryCohere Command AFalcon (TII)
Ease of Use6.57.0
Output Quality8.56.5
Value7.09.0
Features8.06.0
Overall7.57.1

Pricing Comparison

FeatureCohere Command AFalcon (TII)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Falcon 3 10B benchmarks — Cohere Command A has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU73.1%
GPQA Diamond42.5%
HumanEval73.8%
MATH55.4%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Cohere Command A if...

  • Higher output quality (8.5 vs 6.5)
  • More features (8 vs 6)

Mid-size to large enterprises needing a multilingual open-weight model with low-ish infrastructure requirements (2x H100 for full model). Especially good for retrieval-augmented generation over internal document stores, multi-language customer support, and workflows touching Asian / Middle Eastern / African languages where Command A's coverage materially beats Llama or Mistral. Also a strong pick for teams already in Cohere's enterprise ecosystem.

Visit Cohere Command A

Pick Falcon (TII) if...

  • Better value for money (9/10)

Developers who need a genuinely Apache-2.0 small model for on-device or edge deployment, or who need strong Arabic/multilingual support.

Visit Falcon (TII)

Our Verdict

Cohere Command A edges out Falcon (TII) with a 7.5 vs 7.1 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Cohere Command A has the advantage in output quality.