Windsurf vs Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Windsurf

B
7.5/10

Cognition's AI code editor -- Windsurf 2.0 (launched 2026-04-15) adds Agent Command Center, Spaces, and embedded Devin cloud agents. Directly competitive with Cursor 3

Powered by Cognition hosted models + Claude / GPT / Gemini (user selects) + Devin cloud agent

Our Pick

Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0

A
8.4/10

Microsoft's MIT-licensed open-source agent orchestration framework -- GA on 2026-04-03. Merges Semantic Kernel and AutoGen into a single SDK. Python and .NET. Native MCP and A2A protocol support. Connectors for Foundry, Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Claude, Bedrock, Gemini, Ollama

CategoryWindsurfMicrosoft Agent Framework 1.0
Ease of Use8.06.0
Output Quality7.08.5
Value8.010.0
Features7.09.0
Overall7.58.4

Pricing Comparison

FeatureWindsurfMicrosoft Agent Framework 1.0
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Windsurf if...

  • Easier to use (8 vs 6)

Developers who want agent-first coding (background + inline) inside a familiar VS Code-based editor, and who value Cognition's Devin integration as a core part of the workflow. The April 2026 redesign makes Windsurf 2.0 a direct alternative to Cursor 3 for this use case.

Visit Windsurf

Pick Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 if...

  • Higher output quality (8.5 vs 7)
  • Better value for money (10/10)
  • More features (9 vs 7)

Enterprise developers on .NET or mixed Python + .NET stacks who want an MIT-licensed agent orchestration framework with real enterprise credibility. Also good for Azure Foundry customers who want first-class native integration. Teams migrating from Semantic Kernel or AutoGen should plan the move to Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 now rather than later.

Visit Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0

Our Verdict

Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 edges out Windsurf with a 8.4 vs 7.5 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 has the advantage in output quality.