StepFun Step 3.5 Flash vs Grammarly

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

StepFun Step 3.5 Flash

B
7.8/10

StepFun's (China) agent-focused open-weight model -- Step 3.5 Flash launched 2026-02-01. 196B sparse MoE, ~11B active. Benchmarks slightly ahead of DeepSeek V3.2 at over 3x smaller total size. Step 3 (321B / 38B active, Apache 2.0) and Step3-VL-10B multimodal also in the family

Our Pick

Grammarly

A
8.0/10

AI writing assistant that catches errors everywhere you type -- now with full AI rewriting

CategoryStepFun Step 3.5 FlashGrammarly
Ease of Use6.010.0
Output Quality8.07.0
Value9.07.0
Features8.08.0
Overall7.88.0

Pricing Comparison

FeatureStepFun Step 3.5 FlashGrammarly
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Which Should You Pick?

Pick StepFun Step 3.5 Flash if...

  • Higher output quality (8 vs 7)
  • Better value for money (9/10)

Teams building agent systems on Chinese open-weight foundations who want something other than DeepSeek or Qwen, especially if agentic tool-use is the primary workload. Also good for Chinese-market products where StepFun's domestic tuning advantages matter. And for anyone looking to add diversity to their open-weight evaluation matrix beyond the top-3 Chinese labs.

Visit StepFun Step 3.5 Flash

Pick Grammarly if...

  • Easier to use (10 vs 6)

Non-native English speakers, professionals who write lots of emails, and anyone who wants a passive grammar net running in the background. It catches things you'd miss.

Visit Grammarly

Our Verdict

StepFun Step 3.5 Flash and Grammarly are extremely close overall. Your choice comes down to specific needs -- StepFun Step 3.5 Flash is better for teams building agent systems on chinese open-weight foundations who want something other than deepseek or qwen, especially if agentic tool-use is the primary workload, while Grammarly works best for non-native english speakers, professionals who write lots of emails, and anyone who wants a passive grammar net running in the background.