StepFun Step 3.5 Flash vs ChatGPT

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

StepFun Step 3.5 Flash

B
7.8/10

StepFun's (China) agent-focused open-weight model -- Step 3.5 Flash launched 2026-02-01. 196B sparse MoE, ~11B active. Benchmarks slightly ahead of DeepSeek V3.2 at over 3x smaller total size. Step 3 (321B / 38B active, Apache 2.0) and Step3-VL-10B multimodal also in the family

Our Pick

ChatGPT

A
8.8/10

The chatbot that started the AI revolution -- most popular AI assistant in the world

CategoryStepFun Step 3.5 FlashChatGPT
Ease of Use6.010.0
Output Quality8.08.0
Value9.08.0
Features8.09.0
Overall7.88.8

Pricing Comparison

FeatureStepFun Step 3.5 FlashChatGPT
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

GPT-5.4 benchmarks — StepFun Step 3.5 Flash has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU91%
GPQA Diamond92.8%
AIME 202483.3%
HumanEval95%
SWE-bench72%
ARC-AGI73.3%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick StepFun Step 3.5 Flash if...

  • Better value for money (9/10)

Teams building agent systems on Chinese open-weight foundations who want something other than DeepSeek or Qwen, especially if agentic tool-use is the primary workload. Also good for Chinese-market products where StepFun's domestic tuning advantages matter. And for anyone looking to add diversity to their open-weight evaluation matrix beyond the top-3 Chinese labs.

Visit StepFun Step 3.5 Flash

Pick ChatGPT if...

  • Easier to use (10 vs 6)
  • More features (9 vs 8)

Everyone. Seriously -- if you're new to AI or want the most complete all-in-one package, ChatGPT is the default recommendation.

Visit ChatGPT

Our Verdict

ChatGPT is the clear winner here with 8.8/10 vs 7.8/10. StepFun Step 3.5 Flash isn't bad, but ChatGPT outperforms it across the board. Pick StepFun Step 3.5 Flash only if teams building agent systems on chinese open-weight foundations who want something other than deepseek or qwen, especially if agentic tool-use is the primary workload.