StepFun Step 3.5 Flash vs Agentforce Vibes 2.0

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

StepFun Step 3.5 Flash

B
7.8/10

StepFun's (China) agent-focused open-weight model -- Step 3.5 Flash launched 2026-02-01. 196B sparse MoE, ~11B active. Benchmarks slightly ahead of DeepSeek V3.2 at over 3x smaller total size. Step 3 (321B / 38B active, Apache 2.0) and Step3-VL-10B multimodal also in the family

Agentforce Vibes 2.0

B
7.3/10

Salesforce's multi-model agent platform (Claude Sonnet + GPT-5 + open harness), paired with Headless 360 that turns every Salesforce capability into an API/MCP/CLI for external agents. Launched at TDX 2026 on 2026-04-15

CategoryStepFun Step 3.5 FlashAgentforce Vibes 2.0
Ease of Use6.06.0
Output Quality8.08.0
Value9.06.0
Features8.09.0
Overall7.87.3

Pricing Comparison

FeatureStepFun Step 3.5 FlashAgentforce Vibes 2.0
Free TierYesNo
Starting Price$0Contact sales

Which Should You Pick?

Pick StepFun Step 3.5 Flash if...

  • Better value for money (9/10)
  • Has a free tier

Teams building agent systems on Chinese open-weight foundations who want something other than DeepSeek or Qwen, especially if agentic tool-use is the primary workload. Also good for Chinese-market products where StepFun's domestic tuning advantages matter. And for anyone looking to add diversity to their open-weight evaluation matrix beyond the top-3 Chinese labs.

Visit StepFun Step 3.5 Flash

Pick Agentforce Vibes 2.0 if...

  • More features (9 vs 8)

Enterprise Salesforce shops with existing Agentforce deployments and mature agent platform teams. Also firms where Claude or GPT-5 are already approved for enterprise use -- Vibes 2.0 inherits model selection flexibility.

Visit Agentforce Vibes 2.0

Our Verdict

StepFun Step 3.5 Flash edges out Agentforce Vibes 2.0 with a 7.8 vs 7.3 overall score. Both are solid picks, but StepFun Step 3.5 Flash has the advantage in value.