Nemotron (Nvidia) vs StepFun Step 3.5 Flash

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

Nemotron (Nvidia)

B
7.8/10

Nvidia's open-weights family -- hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE architecture, optimized for efficient reasoning on Nvidia hardware

StepFun Step 3.5 Flash

B
7.8/10

StepFun's (China) agent-focused open-weight model -- Step 3.5 Flash launched 2026-02-01. 196B sparse MoE, ~11B active. Benchmarks slightly ahead of DeepSeek V3.2 at over 3x smaller total size. Step 3 (321B / 38B active, Apache 2.0) and Step3-VL-10B multimodal also in the family

CategoryNemotron (Nvidia)StepFun Step 3.5 Flash
Ease of Use6.56.0
Output Quality8.08.0
Value8.09.0
Features8.58.0
Overall7.87.8

Pricing Comparison

FeatureNemotron (Nvidia)StepFun Step 3.5 Flash
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Nemotron 3 Ultra (253B) benchmarks — StepFun Step 3.5 Flash has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU-Pro79.8%
GPQA Diamond70.5%
AIME 202584.5%
HumanEval89.6%
MMLU (Llama-Nemotron 70B)88.4%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Nemotron (Nvidia) if...

Teams running on Nvidia hardware (TensorRT-LLM, NIM) who need efficient long-context reasoning. Nemotron 3 Super is a standout for its 8 GB VRAM footprint with strong reasoning.

Visit Nemotron (Nvidia)

Pick StepFun Step 3.5 Flash if...

  • Better value for money (9/10)

Teams building agent systems on Chinese open-weight foundations who want something other than DeepSeek or Qwen, especially if agentic tool-use is the primary workload. Also good for Chinese-market products where StepFun's domestic tuning advantages matter. And for anyone looking to add diversity to their open-weight evaluation matrix beyond the top-3 Chinese labs.

Visit StepFun Step 3.5 Flash

Our Verdict

Nemotron (Nvidia) and StepFun Step 3.5 Flash are extremely close overall. Your choice comes down to specific needs -- Nemotron (Nvidia) is better for teams running on nvidia hardware (tensorrt-llm, nim) who need efficient long-context reasoning, while StepFun Step 3.5 Flash works best for teams building agent systems on chinese open-weight foundations who want something other than deepseek or qwen, especially if agentic tool-use is the primary workload.