Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Synthesia
Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Google's Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model -- the best-in-class text-in-image renderer, now the default across the Gemini app
Synthesia
Create talking-head videos with AI avatars -- no camera, no actors, no studio needed
| Category | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) | Synthesia |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 9.5 | 9.0 |
| Output Quality | 9.5 | 7.0 |
| Value | 8.5 | 6.0 |
| Features | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Overall | 8.9 | 7.5 |
Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) | Synthesia |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | $0 | $0 |
Which Should You Pick?
Pick Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) if...
- ✓Higher output quality (9.5 vs 7)
- ✓Better value for money (8.5/10)
Designers, marketers, and content creators who need readable text in images (social posts, ad creative, book covers, infographics, event flyers) and who are already using or willing to pay for Gemini. If any part of your commercial design work requires typography to look right, Nano Banana 2 is the 2026 leader.
Visit Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Pick Synthesia if...
Corporate teams producing training, onboarding, and internal comms videos at scale across multiple languages.
Visit SynthesiaOur Verdict
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is the clear winner here with 8.9/10 vs 7.5/10. Synthesia isn't bad, but Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) outperforms it across the board. Pick Synthesia only if corporate teams producing training, onboarding, and internal comms videos at scale across multiple languages.