Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3)
Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Google's Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model -- the best-in-class text-in-image renderer, now the default across the Gemini app
Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3)
Tencent's Hy3 Preview launched 2026-04-23 -- 295B total / 21B active MoE, 256K context, open-sourced on HuggingFace under tencent/Hy3-preview. Cheapest frontier-class API at ~1.2 RMB per million input tokens. Integrated into Yuanbao, WeChat, QQ
| Category | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) | Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3) |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 9.5 | 7.0 |
| Output Quality | 9.5 | 8.0 |
| Value | 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Features | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Overall | 8.9 | 8.1 |
Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) | Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3) |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | $0 | $0 |
Which Should You Pick?
Pick Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) if...
- ✓Higher output quality (9.5 vs 8)
- ✓Easier to use (9.5 vs 7)
Designers, marketers, and content creators who need readable text in images (social posts, ad creative, book covers, infographics, event flyers) and who are already using or willing to pay for Gemini. If any part of your commercial design work requires typography to look right, Nano Banana 2 is the 2026 leader.
Visit Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Pick Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3) if...
- ✓Better value for money (9.5/10)
Chinese-market builders, multilingual products that need strong CN performance, and cost-sensitive developers who want frontier-class quality at sub-DeepSeek pricing. Also anyone watching the open-weights field who wants Tencent's distribution-backed entry on the bench.
Visit Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3)Our Verdict
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) edges out Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3) with a 8.9 vs 8.1 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has the advantage in output quality.