Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Grok

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

A
8.9/10

Google's Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model -- the best-in-class text-in-image renderer, now the default across the Gemini app

Grok

B
7.5/10

xAI's irreverent chatbot with a direct line to X/Twitter -- real-time data meets unfiltered personality

CategoryNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Grok
Ease of Use9.57.0
Output Quality9.57.5
Value8.57.5
Features8.08.0
Overall8.97.5

Pricing Comparison

FeatureNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Grok
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Grok 4.20 benchmarks — Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU88.5%
GPQA Diamond85%
HumanEval90%
Humanity's Last Exam50.7%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) if...

  • Higher output quality (9.5 vs 7.5)
  • Easier to use (9.5 vs 7)
  • Better value for money (8.5/10)

Designers, marketers, and content creators who need readable text in images (social posts, ad creative, book covers, infographics, event flyers) and who are already using or willing to pay for Gemini. If any part of your commercial design work requires typography to look right, Nano Banana 2 is the 2026 leader.

Visit Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Pick Grok if...

People who live on X/Twitter and want an AI that can tap into that data in real-time. Also good for users who find mainstream chatbots too sanitized and want something with more personality.

Visit Grok

Our Verdict

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is the clear winner here with 8.9/10 vs 7.5/10. Grok isn't bad, but Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) outperforms it across the board. Pick Grok only if people who live on x/twitter and want an ai that can tap into that data in real-time.