MiniMax M2 / M2.5 vs Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

MiniMax M2 / M2.5

A
8.4/10

MiniMax's open-weights frontier -- first open model to match Claude Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench at 10-20× lower cost

Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0

A
8.4/10

Microsoft's MIT-licensed open-source agent orchestration framework -- GA on 2026-04-03. Merges Semantic Kernel and AutoGen into a single SDK. Python and .NET. Native MCP and A2A protocol support. Connectors for Foundry, Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Claude, Bedrock, Gemini, Ollama

CategoryMiniMax M2 / M2.5Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0
Ease of Use6.56.0
Output Quality9.08.5
Value9.510.0
Features8.59.0
Overall8.48.4

Pricing Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2 / M2.5Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

MiniMax M2.5 (230B/10B active MoE) benchmarks — Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU-Pro82.1%
GPQA Diamond76.8%
SWE-Bench Verified80.2%
HumanEval91%
AIME 202585.3%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick MiniMax M2 / M2.5 if...

Agentic coding and tool-use workflows on a budget. Best price-to-SWE-Bench ratio of any open-weights model in 2026.

Visit MiniMax M2 / M2.5

Pick Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 if...

Enterprise developers on .NET or mixed Python + .NET stacks who want an MIT-licensed agent orchestration framework with real enterprise credibility. Also good for Azure Foundry customers who want first-class native integration. Teams migrating from Semantic Kernel or AutoGen should plan the move to Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 now rather than later.

Visit Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0

Our Verdict

MiniMax M2 / M2.5 and Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 are extremely close overall. Your choice comes down to specific needs -- MiniMax M2 / M2.5 is better for agentic coding and tool-use workflows on a budget, while Microsoft Agent Framework 1.0 works best for enterprise developers on .