MiniMax M2 / M2.5 vs Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

MiniMax M2 / M2.5

A
8.4/10

MiniMax's open-weights frontier -- first open model to match Claude Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench at 10-20× lower cost

Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1

B
7.9/10

Microsoft's first in-house speech-recognition model -- launched 2026-04-02. #1 on FLEURS WER overall, #1 by FLEURS WER in 11 of the top 25 global languages. Beats Whisper-large-v3, Scribe v2, GPT-Transcribe, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite. $0.36/hour of audio on Azure Foundry

CategoryMiniMax M2 / M2.5Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1
Ease of Use6.56.0
Output Quality9.09.5
Value9.59.0
Features8.57.0
Overall8.47.9

Pricing Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2 / M2.5Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0.36

Benchmark Head-to-Head

MiniMax M2.5 (230B/10B active MoE) benchmarks — Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1 has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU-Pro82.1%
GPQA Diamond76.8%
SWE-Bench Verified80.2%
HumanEval91%
AIME 202585.3%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick MiniMax M2 / M2.5 if...

  • More features (8.5 vs 7)

Agentic coding and tool-use workflows on a budget. Best price-to-SWE-Bench ratio of any open-weights model in 2026.

Visit MiniMax M2 / M2.5

Pick Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1 if...

Developers and enterprises who need best-in-class multilingual speech-to-text for high-volume use cases (meeting recording pipelines, call-center transcription, accessibility captioning at scale, multilingual audio indexing). Especially relevant for Azure shops already on Microsoft infrastructure.

Visit Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1

Our Verdict

MiniMax M2 / M2.5 edges out Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1 with a 8.4 vs 7.9 overall score. Both are solid picks, but MiniMax M2 / M2.5 has the advantage in value.