MiniMax M2 / M2.5 vs Lyria 3 Pro (Google)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

MiniMax M2 / M2.5

A
8.4/10

MiniMax's open-weights frontier -- first open model to match Claude Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench at 10-20× lower cost

Lyria 3 Pro (Google)

B
7.8/10

Google DeepMind's music generation model -- 3-minute structured songs with intro, verse, chorus, and outro control

CategoryMiniMax M2 / M2.5Lyria 3 Pro (Google)
Ease of Use6.58.0
Output Quality9.08.0
Value9.57.0
Features8.58.0
Overall8.47.8

Pricing Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2 / M2.5Lyria 3 Pro (Google)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

MiniMax M2.5 (230B/10B active MoE) benchmarks — Lyria 3 Pro (Google) has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU-Pro82.1%
GPQA Diamond76.8%
SWE-Bench Verified80.2%
HumanEval91%
AIME 202585.3%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick MiniMax M2 / M2.5 if...

  • Higher output quality (9 vs 8)
  • Better value for money (9.5/10)

Agentic coding and tool-use workflows on a budget. Best price-to-SWE-Bench ratio of any open-weights model in 2026.

Visit MiniMax M2 / M2.5

Pick Lyria 3 Pro (Google) if...

  • Easier to use (8 vs 6.5)

Content creators who already pay for a Gemini or Google AI subscription and want longer, more structured AI music. Also great for developers building music features into their own apps via the $0.08/song API.

Visit Lyria 3 Pro (Google)

Our Verdict

MiniMax M2 / M2.5 edges out Lyria 3 Pro (Google) with a 8.4 vs 7.8 overall score. Both are solid picks, but MiniMax M2 / M2.5 has the advantage in output quality.