MiniMax M2 / M2.5 vs Jasper

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

MiniMax M2 / M2.5

A
8.4/10

MiniMax's open-weights frontier -- first open model to match Claude Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench at 10-20× lower cost

Jasper

B
7.0/10

AI writing platform built for marketing teams -- templates, brand voice, and campaign workflows

CategoryMiniMax M2 / M2.5Jasper
Ease of Use6.58.0
Output Quality9.07.0
Value9.55.0
Features8.58.0
Overall8.47.0

Pricing Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2 / M2.5Jasper
Free TierYesNo
Starting Price$0$49

Benchmark Head-to-Head

MiniMax M2.5 (230B/10B active MoE) benchmarks — Jasper has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU-Pro82.1%
GPQA Diamond76.8%
SWE-Bench Verified80.2%
HumanEval91%
AIME 202585.3%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick MiniMax M2 / M2.5 if...

  • Higher output quality (9 vs 7)
  • Better value for money (9.5/10)
  • Has a free tier

Agentic coding and tool-use workflows on a budget. Best price-to-SWE-Bench ratio of any open-weights model in 2026.

Visit MiniMax M2 / M2.5

Pick Jasper if...

  • Easier to use (8 vs 6.5)

Marketing teams at companies with budget who need collaboration features and brand consistency. The templates and workflow tools save time when you're producing lots of marketing content.

Visit Jasper

Our Verdict

MiniMax M2 / M2.5 is the clear winner here with 8.4/10 vs 7.0/10. Jasper isn't bad, but MiniMax M2 / M2.5 outperforms it across the board. Pick Jasper only if marketing teams at companies with budget who need collaboration features and brand consistency.