MiniMax M2 / M2.5 vs Devin
Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.
MiniMax M2 / M2.5
MiniMax's open-weights frontier -- first open model to match Claude Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench at 10-20× lower cost
Devin
The most autonomous AI coding agent -- it researches, plans, writes code, and tests it without hand-holding
Powered by Multiple models (proprietary orchestration)
| Category | MiniMax M2 / M2.5 | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Output Quality | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Value | 9.5 | 7.0 |
| Features | 8.5 | 8.0 |
| Overall | 8.4 | 7.4 |
Pricing Comparison
| Feature | MiniMax M2 / M2.5 | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | Yes | No |
| Starting Price | $0 | $20 |
Benchmark Head-to-Head
MiniMax M2.5 (230B/10B active MoE) benchmarks — Devin has no published benchmarks
| Benchmark | Description | Score |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | Harder multi-subject reasoning | 82.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | Graduate-level science questions | 76.8% |
| SWE-Bench Verified | 80.2% | |
| HumanEval | Python code generation | 91% |
| AIME 2025 | 85.3% |
Which Should You Pick?
Pick MiniMax M2 / M2.5 if...
- ✓Higher output quality (9 vs 8)
- ✓Better value for money (9.5/10)
- ✓Has a free tier
Agentic coding and tool-use workflows on a budget. Best price-to-SWE-Bench ratio of any open-weights model in 2026.
Visit MiniMax M2 / M2.5Pick Devin if...
Development teams that want to offload well-scoped tasks like bug fixes, test writing, and boilerplate code to an autonomous agent. Best when the task description is detailed and specific.
Visit DevinOur Verdict
MiniMax M2 / M2.5 is the clear winner here with 8.4/10 vs 7.4/10. Devin isn't bad, but MiniMax M2 / M2.5 outperforms it across the board. Pick Devin only if development teams that want to offload well-scoped tasks like bug fixes, test writing, and boilerplate code to an autonomous agent.