MiniMax M2 / M2.5 vs Captions

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

MiniMax M2 / M2.5

A
8.4/10

MiniMax's open-weights frontier -- first open model to match Claude Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench at 10-20× lower cost

Captions

C
6.5/10

AI video editor with auto captions, eye contact correction, and dubbing for talking-head content

CategoryMiniMax M2 / M2.5Captions
Ease of Use6.58.0
Output Quality9.06.0
Value9.55.0
Features8.57.0
Overall8.46.5

Pricing Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2 / M2.5Captions
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

MiniMax M2.5 (230B/10B active MoE) benchmarks — Captions has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU-Pro82.1%
GPQA Diamond76.8%
SWE-Bench Verified80.2%
HumanEval91%
AIME 202585.3%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick MiniMax M2 / M2.5 if...

  • Higher output quality (9 vs 6)
  • Better value for money (9.5/10)
  • More features (8.5 vs 7)

Agentic coding and tool-use workflows on a budget. Best price-to-SWE-Bench ratio of any open-weights model in 2026.

Visit MiniMax M2 / M2.5

Pick Captions if...

  • Easier to use (8 vs 6.5)

Short-form content creators who mostly do talking-head videos and need polished captions fast. If you stick to the caption features, it does that job well.

Visit Captions

Our Verdict

MiniMax M2 / M2.5 is the clear winner here with 8.4/10 vs 6.5/10. Captions isn't bad, but MiniMax M2 / M2.5 outperforms it across the board. Pick Captions only if short-form content creators who mostly do talking-head videos and need polished captions fast.