MiniMax M2.7
Free tier available
- Self-hosted (Free)$0
- API (M2 / M2.5 reference, MiniMax / OpenRouter)$0.30/per 1M input tokens
- API (M2.7)Not yet published
Our pickA
8.4/10MiniMax M2.7
VS
A
8.0/10Google Antigravity
Gemini 3.5 Flash / Gemini 3.1 Pro / Claude Opus 4.6 / GPT-OSS 120B (multi-model). Gemini 3.5 Flash added at I/O 2026 (2026-05-19) and is the model behind the antigravity-preview-05-2026 Managed Agent.
MiniMax M2.7 vs Google Antigravity
Tier-list head-to-head. MiniMax M2.7 takes the A-tier slot — here's the breakdown.
Last reviewed May 20, 2026· sweep-fresh
Spec sheet
At a glance
| MiniMax M2.7 | Google Antigravity | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | A-tierwin | A-tier |
| Overall score | 8.4 / 10win | 8.0 / 10 |
| Powered by | — | Gemini 3.5 Flash / Gemini 3.1 Pro / Claude Opus 4.6 / GPT-OSS 120B (multi-model). Gemini 3.5 Flash added at I/O 2026 (2026-05-19) and is the model behind the antigravity-preview-05-2026 Managed Agent. |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Best for | Agentic coding and tool-use workflows on a budget. | Developers working on large, multi-file projects who want to parallelize their workflow. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-04-27 | 2026-05-20 |
Head-to-head
Score showdown
Rated 1-10 on the same rubric across all 130 tools we cover.
Ease of use+1.5 Google Antigravity
MiniMax M2.7
6.5
Google Antigravity
8.0
Output quality+0.5 MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7
9.0
Google Antigravity
8.5
Value+3.5 MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7
9.5
Google Antigravity
6.0
Features+1.0 Google Antigravity
MiniMax M2.7
8.5
Google Antigravity
9.5
Overall+0.4 MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7
8.4
Google Antigravity
8.0
What you'll pay
Pricing snapshot
Look past the headline number -- entry-tier limits drive most cost surprises.
Google Antigravity
Free tier available
- Free$0
- Pro$20/mo
- Ultra$249.99/mo
Benchmark Head-to-Head
MiniMax-M2.7 (229B total, ~10B active MoE) -- self-evolving agent positioning per vendor benchmarks — Google Antigravity has no published benchmarks
| Benchmark | Description | Score |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-Bench Pro | 56.22% | |
| Terminal Bench 2 | 57% | |
| SWE Multilingual | 76.5% | |
| Multi SWE Bench | 52.7% | |
| VIBE-Pro | 55.6% |
The decision
Which should you pick?
Use-case anchors and category strengths, side by side.
Pick MiniMax M2.7if…
A
8.4/10- ✓Better value at the price you'll actually pay (9.5/10 on value)
- ✓Agentic coding and tool-use workflows on a budget.
- ✓Best price-to-SWE-Bench ratio of any open-weights model in 2026.
Agentic coding and tool-use workflows on a budget. Best price-to-SWE-Bench ratio of any open-weights model in 2026.
Visit MiniMax M2.7Pick Google Antigravityif…
A
8.0/10- ✓Easier to learn and use day-to-day -- friendlier onboarding curve
- ✓More feature surface area for power users who'll use the depth
- ✓Developers working on large, multi-file projects who want to parallelize their workflow.
- ✓If you regularly work on 3-5 tasks simultaneously (fix a bug, add a feature, write tests, refactor), Antigravity's multi-agent architecture is unmatched.
Developers working on large, multi-file projects who want to parallelize their workflow. If you regularly work on 3-5 tasks simultaneously (fix a bug, add a feature, write tests, refactor), Antigravity's multi-agent architecture is unmatched.
Visit Google AntigravityBottom line
The verdict
MiniMax M2.7 edges out Google Antigravity by 0.4 points (8.4 vs 8.0) -- a A-tier vs A-tier split that's narrow but real. Not a blowout; both belong on a shortlist. The score gap shows up most clearly in the categories that matter for MiniMax M2.7's strengths, so if those categories are your priority, the lead translates.
Pricing-wise, both tools have a free tier (MiniMax M2.7 starts $0, Google Antigravity starts $0), so you can test either without committing. Compare what each free tier actually unlocks -- usage caps, model access, and feature gates differ a lot more than the headline price suggests, especially as both vendors have tightened limits in 2026.
By use case: pick MiniMax M2.7 when agentic coding and tool-use workflows on a budget. Pick Google Antigravity when developers working on large, multi-file projects who want to parallelize their workflow. The two tools aren't fighting for the same person -- they're aiming at adjacent jobs that occasionally overlap. If you're squarely in MiniMax M2.7's lane, the tier-list ranking and the use-case fit point the same direction; if you're in Google Antigravity's lane, the score gap matters less than the fit.
Bottom line: MiniMax M2.7 is the safer default for most readers, but Google Antigravity is competitive enough that the tie-breaker is your specific workload, not the spec sheet.
Keep digging
Compare more & explore
Full MiniMax M2.7 review
Tier A · 8.4/10
Full Google Antigravity review
Tier A · 8.0/10
MiniMax M2.7 alternatives
Other tools in this lane
Google Antigravity alternatives
Other tools in this lane
Compare MiniMax M2.7 vs:Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Muse Spark (Meta)Qwen (Alibaba)Seedance 2.0
Compare Google Antigravity vs:Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Muse Spark (Meta)Qwen (Alibaba)Seedance 2.0
Built from our daily AI-tool sweep, last touched May 20, 2026. Honest tier-list reviews — no affiliate-link pieces disguised as advice. See the rubric or how we review.