MiMo (Xiaomi) vs Google Veo 3.1

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

MiMo (Xiaomi)

A
8.3/10

Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 family launched 2026-04-22 -- Pro (1T total / 42B active MoE, 1M context, native vision+audio reasoning), Multimodal base, TTS (3 sub-models: base, VoiceDesign, VoiceClone), and ASR (open-source, English + Chinese + major dialects). Full voice pipeline for the agent era. Extra-charge 1M-context tier removed at launch

Google Veo 3.1

B
7.9/10

Google's dominant AI video generator -- native 4K at 60fps with synchronized audio, now free to every Google account via Google Vids

CategoryMiMo (Xiaomi)Google Veo 3.1
Ease of Use7.07.5
Output Quality8.09.5
Value9.06.5
Features9.08.0
Overall8.37.9

Pricing Comparison

FeatureMiMo (Xiaomi)Google Veo 3.1
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Which Should You Pick?

Pick MiMo (Xiaomi) if...

  • Better value for money (9/10)
  • More features (9 vs 8)

Teams building voice-first agentic products that need a coordinated reasoning + TTS + ASR stack from a single vendor. Also Chinese-market builders and developers who need strong multimodal (vision + audio) inputs in one API call without stitching three providers together. The no-surcharge 1M-context stance makes MiMo-V2.5-Pro especially attractive for long-document agentic workloads.

Visit MiMo (Xiaomi)

Pick Google Veo 3.1 if...

  • Higher output quality (9.5 vs 8)

Creators who need the highest-quality AI video available and want free or low-cost access. The April 2026 free rollout to every Google account via Google Vids makes Veo 3.1 the new default starting point for anyone trying AI video seriously. Professional production teams benefit from Ultra's unlimited generations.

Visit Google Veo 3.1

Our Verdict

MiMo (Xiaomi) edges out Google Veo 3.1 with a 8.3 vs 7.9 overall score. Both are solid picks, but MiMo (Xiaomi) has the advantage in value.