Microsoft MAI-Image-2 vs Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Microsoft MAI-Image-2

B
7.4/10

Microsoft's first in-house diffusion image model -- launched 2026-04-02, debuted #3 on Arena.ai leaderboard for image model families. Public preview on Azure Foundry. Powers Copilot, Bing Image Creator, and PowerPoint. Efficient variant (MAI-Image-2-Efficient) shipped 2026-04-14

Our Pick

Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3)

A
8.1/10

Tencent's Hy3 Preview launched 2026-04-23 -- 295B total / 21B active MoE, 256K context, open-sourced on HuggingFace under tencent/Hy3-preview. Cheapest frontier-class API at ~1.2 RMB per million input tokens. Integrated into Yuanbao, WeChat, QQ

CategoryMicrosoft MAI-Image-2Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3)
Ease of Use6.57.0
Output Quality8.58.0
Value7.59.5
Features7.08.0
Overall7.48.1

Pricing Comparison

FeatureMicrosoft MAI-Image-2Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$5 input / $33 output$0

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Microsoft MAI-Image-2 if...

Microsoft shops already on Azure or M365 Copilot who need a first-party image model without an OpenAI dependency. Also good for any high-volume programmatic image workflow (ad creative, product photography variations) where MAI-Image-2-Efficient's 4x cost efficiency materially changes the economics.

Visit Microsoft MAI-Image-2

Pick Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3) if...

  • Better value for money (9.5/10)
  • More features (8 vs 7)

Chinese-market builders, multilingual products that need strong CN performance, and cost-sensitive developers who want frontier-class quality at sub-DeepSeek pricing. Also anyone watching the open-weights field who wants Tencent's distribution-backed entry on the bench.

Visit Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3)

Our Verdict

Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3) edges out Microsoft MAI-Image-2 with a 8.1 vs 7.4 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3) has the advantage in value.