Llama 4 (Meta) vs Perplexity Comet

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Llama 4 (Meta)

B
7.9/10

Meta's open-weights flagship family -- Scout (10M context), Maverick (multimodal 400B MoE), Behemoth in preview

Our Pick

Perplexity Comet

A
8.4/10

Perplexity's agentic AI browser -- FREE on all platforms as of 2026-03-18 (previously $200/mo Max-only). iOS, Android, Windows, Mac. Browses the web, executes multi-step tasks, and summarizes pages in-line. Comet Plus ($5/mo) adds premium publisher content

CategoryLlama 4 (Meta)Perplexity Comet
Ease of Use5.08.0
Output Quality8.58.0
Value9.09.5
Features9.08.0
Overall7.98.4

Pricing Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 (Meta)Perplexity Comet
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Llama 4 Maverick (17B/400B MoE) benchmarks — Perplexity Comet has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU-Pro80.5%
GPQA Diamond69.8%
HumanEval88%
MMMU (multimodal)73.4%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Llama 4 (Meta) if...

  • More features (9 vs 8)

Developers and teams who need a permissively-licensed open-weights model with strong tooling, long context (Scout), or multimodal (Maverick). Safe default choice given the ecosystem.

Visit Llama 4 (Meta)

Pick Perplexity Comet if...

  • Easier to use (8 vs 5)

Users who already use Perplexity for search and want an agent browser that can complete multi-step tasks (booking, research, shopping, document summarization) across tabs. Also a strong introduction to the AI-browser category for anyone curious but unwilling to pay $200/mo for a preview -- the 2026-03-18 free rollout makes evaluation risk-free.

Visit Perplexity Comet

Our Verdict

Perplexity Comet edges out Llama 4 (Meta) with a 8.4 vs 7.9 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Perplexity Comet has the advantage in value.