Llama 4 (Meta) vs gpt-oss (OpenAI)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Llama 4 (Meta)

B
7.9/10

Meta's open-weights flagship family -- Scout (10M context), Maverick (multimodal 400B MoE), Behemoth in preview

Our Pick

gpt-oss (OpenAI)

A
8.1/10

OpenAI's FIRST open-weight models -- gpt-oss-120b (single 80GB GPU, near parity with o4-mini on reasoning) and gpt-oss-20b (runs on 16GB edge devices). Apache 2.0. Launched 2025-08-05. gpt-oss-safeguard ships in 2026 as the safety-tuned variant

CategoryLlama 4 (Meta)gpt-oss (OpenAI)
Ease of Use5.07.0
Output Quality8.58.5
Value9.010.0
Features9.07.0
Overall7.98.1

Pricing Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 (Meta)gpt-oss (OpenAI)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Llama 4 Maverick (17B/400B MoE) benchmarks — gpt-oss (OpenAI) has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU-Pro80.5%
GPQA Diamond69.8%
HumanEval88%
MMMU (multimodal)73.4%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Llama 4 (Meta) if...

  • More features (9 vs 7)

Developers and teams who need a permissively-licensed open-weights model with strong tooling, long context (Scout), or multimodal (Maverick). Safe default choice given the ecosystem.

Visit Llama 4 (Meta)

Pick gpt-oss (OpenAI) if...

  • Easier to use (7 vs 5)
  • Better value for money (10/10)

Developers who want OpenAI-brand open-weight reasoning models for self-hosting or fine-tuning. Particularly good for single-GPU deployments (gpt-oss-120b on one 80GB card) or edge-device reasoning (gpt-oss-20b on 16GB consumer GPUs / Apple Silicon). Also good as a reliable baseline when comparing newer open-weight releases.

Visit gpt-oss (OpenAI)

Our Verdict

Llama 4 (Meta) and gpt-oss (OpenAI) are extremely close overall. Your choice comes down to specific needs -- Llama 4 (Meta) is better for developers and teams who need a permissively-licensed open-weights model with strong tooling, long context (scout), or multimodal (maverick), while gpt-oss (OpenAI) works best for developers who want openai-brand open-weight reasoning models for self-hosting or fine-tuning.