Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot) vs MiniMax M2 / M2.5

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot)

A
8.1/10

Moonshot's 1T-parameter MoE open-weights flagship -- best open-source agentic coder, rivals Claude Opus 4.5

Our Pick

MiniMax M2 / M2.5

A
8.4/10

MiniMax's open-weights frontier -- first open model to match Claude Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench at 10-20× lower cost

CategoryKimi K2.5 (Moonshot)MiniMax M2 / M2.5
Ease of Use6.06.5
Output Quality9.09.0
Value8.59.5
Features9.08.5
Overall8.18.4

Pricing Comparison

FeatureKimi K2.5 (Moonshot)MiniMax M2 / M2.5
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Kimi K2.5 (1T/32B active MoE) vs MiniMax M2.5 (230B/10B active MoE)

BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Moonshot)MiniMax M2 / M2.5
MMLU-Pro84.8%82.1%
GPQA Diamond80.5%76.8%
AIME 202591.2%85.3%
SWE-Bench Verified78.5%80.2%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot) if...

  • Stronger on (+5.9% on AIME 2025)

Agentic coding workflows, tool-use agents, and teams willing to pay hosted-API prices for frontier-tier quality with open-weights licensing protection.

Visit Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot)

Pick MiniMax M2 / M2.5 if...

  • Better value for money (9.5/10)
  • Stronger on (+1.7% on SWE-Bench Verified)

Agentic coding and tool-use workflows on a budget. Best price-to-SWE-Bench ratio of any open-weights model in 2026.

Visit MiniMax M2 / M2.5

Our Verdict

MiniMax M2 / M2.5 edges out Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot) with a 8.4 vs 8.1 overall score. Both are solid picks, but MiniMax M2 / M2.5 has the advantage in value.