Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot) vs Devin

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot)

A
8.1/10

Moonshot's 1T-parameter MoE open-weights flagship -- best open-source agentic coder, rivals Claude Opus 4.5

Devin

B
7.4/10

The most autonomous AI coding agent -- it researches, plans, writes code, and tests it without hand-holding

Powered by Multiple models (proprietary orchestration)

CategoryKimi K2.5 (Moonshot)Devin
Ease of Use6.06.5
Output Quality9.08.0
Value8.57.0
Features9.08.0
Overall8.17.4

Pricing Comparison

FeatureKimi K2.5 (Moonshot)Devin
Free TierYesNo
Starting Price$0$20

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Kimi K2.5 (1T/32B active MoE) benchmarks — Devin has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU-Pro84.8%
GPQA Diamond80.5%
AIME 202591.2%
SWE-Bench Verified78.5%
LiveCodeBench74.1%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot) if...

  • Higher output quality (9 vs 8)
  • Better value for money (8.5/10)
  • More features (9 vs 8)
  • Has a free tier

Agentic coding workflows, tool-use agents, and teams willing to pay hosted-API prices for frontier-tier quality with open-weights licensing protection.

Visit Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot)

Pick Devin if...

Development teams that want to offload well-scoped tasks like bug fixes, test writing, and boilerplate code to an autonomous agent. Best when the task description is detailed and specific.

Visit Devin

Our Verdict

Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot) edges out Devin with a 8.1 vs 7.4 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot) has the advantage in output quality.