Grok
Free tier available
- Free$0
- X Premium$8/mo
- X Premium+$40/mo

Grok
Our pickCursor
Composer 2 (Cursor's own) / Claude Opus 4.6 / GPT-5.4 / Gemini (user selects)
Tier-list head-to-head. Cursor takes the A-tier slot — here's the breakdown.
Spec sheet
| Tier | B-tier | A-tierwin |
| Overall score | 7.5 / 10 | 8.3 / 10win |
| Powered by | — | Composer 2 (Cursor's own) / Claude Opus 4.6 / GPT-5.4 / Gemini (user selects) |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Best for | People who live on X/Twitter and want an AI that can tap into that data in real-time. | Developers who want the deepest AI integration possible and who are ready to work with agents rather than j… |
| Last reviewed | 2026-05-19 | 2026-05-19 |
Head-to-head
Rated 1-10 on the same rubric across all 130 tools we cover.
What you'll pay
Look past the headline number -- entry-tier limits drive most cost surprises.
Free tier available
Free tier available
Grok 4.20 benchmarks — Cursor has no published benchmarks
| Benchmark | Description | Score |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | Knowledge across 57 subjects | 88.5% |
| GPQA Diamond | Graduate-level science questions | 85% |
| HumanEval | Python code generation | 90% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | Frontier difficulty questions | 50.7% |
The decision
Use-case anchors and category strengths, side by side.
People who live on X/Twitter and want an AI that can tap into that data in real-time. Also good for users who find mainstream chatbots too sanitized and want something with more personality.
Visit GrokDevelopers who want the deepest AI integration possible and who are ready to work with agents rather than just autocomplete. Cursor 3's multi-workspace + cross-platform agent story is designed for people who are already living in the Cursor app daily, not dabblers.
Visit CursorBottom line
Cursor edges out Grok by 0.8 points (8.3 vs 7.5) -- a A-tier vs B-tier split that's narrow but real. Not a blowout; both belong on a shortlist. The score gap shows up most clearly in the categories that matter for Cursor's strengths, so if those categories are your priority, the lead translates.
Pricing-wise, both tools have a free tier (Grok starts $0, Cursor starts $0), so you can test either without committing. Compare what each free tier actually unlocks -- usage caps, model access, and feature gates differ a lot more than the headline price suggests, especially as both vendors have tightened limits in 2026.
By use case: pick Grok when people who live on x/twitter and want an ai that can tap into that data in real-time. Pick Cursor when developers who want the deepest ai integration possible and who are ready to work with agents rather than just autocomplete. The two tools aren't fighting for the same person -- they're aiming at adjacent jobs that occasionally overlap. If you're squarely in Cursor's lane, the tier-list ranking and the use-case fit point the same direction; if you're in Grok's lane, the score gap matters less than the fit.
Bottom line: Cursor is the safer default for most readers, but Grok is competitive enough that the tie-breaker is your specific workload, not the spec sheet.
Keep digging
Built from our daily AI-tool sweep, last touched May 19, 2026. Honest tier-list reviews — no affiliate-link pieces disguised as advice. See the rubric or how we review.