Grammarly vs Codestral 2 (Mistral)
Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.
Grammarly
AI writing assistant that catches errors everywhere you type -- now with full AI rewriting
Codestral 2 (Mistral)
Mistral's dedicated code model -- Codestral 2 (launched 2026-04-08) relicensed under Apache 2.0, removing the commercial-use restrictions of the original. 22B dense, strong FIM (fill-in-middle), available via Mistral API + Hugging Face
| Category | Grammarly | Codestral 2 (Mistral) |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 10.0 | 6.0 |
| Output Quality | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| Value | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| Features | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| Overall | 8.0 | 7.5 |
Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Grammarly | Codestral 2 (Mistral) |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | $0 | $0 |
Which Should You Pick?
Pick Grammarly if...
- ✓Easier to use (10 vs 6)
- ✓More features (8 vs 7)
Non-native English speakers, professionals who write lots of emails, and anyone who wants a passive grammar net running in the background. It catches things you'd miss.
Visit GrammarlyPick Codestral 2 (Mistral) if...
- ✓Higher output quality (8 vs 7)
- ✓Better value for money (9/10)
Developers and teams who want a legally-clean open-weights code model they can self-host OR hit via API, particularly those with EU data-residency requirements. Ideal for building in-house IDE extensions, code-review bots, or CI/CD AI integrations where the Apache 2.0 license removes procurement friction.
Visit Codestral 2 (Mistral)Our Verdict
Grammarly edges out Codestral 2 (Mistral) with a 8.0 vs 7.5 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Grammarly has the advantage in features.