GPT-5.4-Cyber (OpenAI) vs Llama 4 (Meta)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

GPT-5.4-Cyber (OpenAI)

B
7.2/10

OpenAI's defensive-cybersecurity variant of GPT-5.4, launched 2026-04-16. Lowered refusal boundary for security-research tasks and native binary reverse-engineering. Access gated via Trusted Access for Cyber (TAC) program -- thousands of verified defenders, hundreds of teams, no public pricing

Our Pick

Llama 4 (Meta)

B
7.9/10

Meta's open-weights flagship family -- Scout (10M context), Maverick (multimodal 400B MoE), Behemoth in preview

CategoryGPT-5.4-Cyber (OpenAI)Llama 4 (Meta)
Ease of Use5.05.0
Output Quality8.58.5
Value7.09.0
Features8.09.0
Overall7.27.9

Pricing Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.4-Cyber (OpenAI)Llama 4 (Meta)
Free TierNoYes
Starting PriceNot publicly disclosed$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

Llama 4 Maverick (17B/400B MoE) benchmarks — GPT-5.4-Cyber (OpenAI) has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU-Pro80.5%
GPQA Diamond69.8%
HumanEval88%
MMMU (multimodal)73.4%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick GPT-5.4-Cyber (OpenAI) if...

Enterprise SOC teams, established security research orgs, and vetted individual defenders who can qualify for Trusted Access for Cyber. Strongest fit if your work involves binary analysis, vulnerability research, or defensive-security tooling where standard GPT-5.4 refusals actually block the work.

Visit GPT-5.4-Cyber (OpenAI)

Pick Llama 4 (Meta) if...

  • Better value for money (9/10)
  • More features (9 vs 8)
  • Has a free tier

Developers and teams who need a permissively-licensed open-weights model with strong tooling, long context (Scout), or multimodal (Maverick). Safe default choice given the ecosystem.

Visit Llama 4 (Meta)

Our Verdict

Llama 4 (Meta) edges out GPT-5.4-Cyber (OpenAI) with a 7.9 vs 7.2 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Llama 4 (Meta) has the advantage in value.