Gemma 4 (Google) vs Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3)
Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.
Gemma 4 (Google)
Google DeepMind's open-weights model family -- multimodal, 256K context, runs on edge devices
Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3)
Tencent's Hy3 Preview launched 2026-04-23 -- 295B total / 21B active MoE, 256K context, open-sourced on HuggingFace under tencent/Hy3-preview. Cheapest frontier-class API at ~1.2 RMB per million input tokens. Integrated into Yuanbao, WeChat, QQ
| Category | Gemma 4 (Google) | Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3) |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Output Quality | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Value | 10.0 | 9.5 |
| Features | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Overall | 8.3 | 8.1 |
Personality & Tone
Gemma 4 (Google): The compact Google cousin
Tone: Similar corporate-Google tone as Gemini but smaller and less polished. Gemma's chat replies are short, cautious, and structured -- closer to a careful intern than a peer.
Quirks: Inherits a Gemini-like safety bias, so refusals appear on prompts Mistral or DeepSeek would answer. Best used as a cheap local fallback or on-device model, not as a personality play.
Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3): Tencent's first serious open-weights LLM
Tone: Direct and structured, similar to DeepSeek's chat tone -- compact answers in technical domains, reasonable Chinese-language polish, English noticeably less expressive than Claude or GPT.
Quirks: PRC content filters apply across the same set of regulated topics as DeepSeek and Qwen. Distribution via Yuanbao + WeChat + QQ means many Hy3 users in the wild are talking to it through chat-app surfaces rather than a developer console.
Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Gemma 4 (Google) | Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3) |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | $0 | $0 |
Benchmark Head-to-Head
Gemma 4 31B benchmarks — Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3) has no published benchmarks
| Benchmark | Description | Score |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | Knowledge across 57 subjects | 83% |
| GPQA Diamond | Graduate-level science questions | 84.3% |
| AIME 2026 | 89.2% | |
| HumanEval | Python code generation | 85% |
Which Should You Pick?
Pick Gemma 4 (Google) if...
Developers and businesses who need a permissively licensed multimodal LLM they can self-host or fine-tune. Especially good for multilingual use cases and on-device deployment.
Visit Gemma 4 (Google)Pick Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3) if...
Chinese-market builders, multilingual products that need strong CN performance, and cost-sensitive developers who want frontier-class quality at sub-DeepSeek pricing. Also anyone watching the open-weights field who wants Tencent's distribution-backed entry on the bench.
Visit Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3)Our Verdict
Gemma 4 (Google) and Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3) are extremely close overall. Your choice comes down to specific needs -- Gemma 4 (Google) is better for developers and businesses who need a permissively licensed multimodal llm they can self-host or fine-tune, while Hunyuan 3 (Tencent Hy3) works best for chinese-market builders, multilingual products that need strong cn performance, and cost-sensitive developers who want frontier-class quality at sub-deepseek pricing.