Devin
No free tier
- Core$20/mo
- Team$40/mo
B
7.4/10Devin
Cognition proprietary orchestration over Claude / GPT / Gemini + Devin's own tuned components
VS
Our pickA
8.8/10ChatGPT
Devin vs ChatGPT
Tier-list head-to-head. ChatGPT takes the A-tier slot — here's the breakdown.
Last reviewed May 19, 2026· sweep-fresh
Spec sheet
At a glance
| Devin | ChatGPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | B-tier | A-tierwin |
| Overall score | 7.4 / 10 | 8.8 / 10win |
| Powered by | Cognition proprietary orchestration over Claude / GPT / Gemini + Devin's own tuned components | — |
| Free tier | No | Yeswin |
| Starting price | $20 | $0 |
| Best for | Development teams that want to offload well-scoped tasks like bug fixes, test writing, and boilerplate code… | Everyone. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-05-13 | 2026-05-19 |
Head-to-head
Score showdown
Rated 1-10 on the same rubric across all 130 tools we cover.
Ease of use+3.5 ChatGPT
Devin
6.5
ChatGPT
10.0
Output qualityTie
Devin
8.0
ChatGPT
8.0
Value+1.0 ChatGPT
Devin
7.0
ChatGPT
8.0
Features+1.0 ChatGPT
Devin
8.0
ChatGPT
9.0
Overall+1.4 ChatGPT
Devin
7.4
ChatGPT
8.8
What you'll pay
Pricing snapshot
Look past the headline number -- entry-tier limits drive most cost surprises.
ChatGPT
Free tier available
- Free$0
- Go$8/mo
- Plus$20/mo
Benchmark Head-to-Head
GPT-5.5 (launched 2026-04-23; scores below are the GPT-5.4 baseline -- GPT-5.5 launch benchmarks per OpenAI are logged in Known Issues, pending third-party verification) benchmarks — Devin has no published benchmarks
| Benchmark | Description | Score |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | Knowledge across 57 subjects | 91% |
| GPQA Diamond | Graduate-level science questions | 92.8% |
| AIME 2024 | Competition math problems | 83.3% |
| HumanEval | Python code generation | 95% |
| SWE-bench | Real GitHub issue fixing | 72% |
| ARC-AGI | Abstract reasoning puzzles | 73.3% |
The decision
Which should you pick?
Use-case anchors and category strengths, side by side.
Pick Devinif…
B
7.4/10- ✓Development teams that want to offload well-scoped tasks like bug fixes, test writing, and boilerplate code to an autonomous agent.
- ✓Best when the task description is detailed and specific.
Development teams that want to offload well-scoped tasks like bug fixes, test writing, and boilerplate code to an autonomous agent. Best when the task description is detailed and specific.
Visit DevinPick ChatGPTif…
A
8.8/10- ✓Easier to learn and use day-to-day -- friendlier onboarding curve
- ✓Better value at the price you'll actually pay (8.0/10 on value)
- ✓More feature surface area for power users who'll use the depth
- ✓Free tier lets you actually try it before paying
- ✓Seriously -- if you're new to AI or want the most complete all-in-one package, ChatGPT is the default recommendation.
Everyone. Seriously -- if you're new to AI or want the most complete all-in-one package, ChatGPT is the default recommendation.
Visit ChatGPTBottom line
The verdict
ChatGPT is the clear winner: 8.8/10 (A-tier) versus 7.4/10 (B-tier). Devin isn't a bad tool, but on every category that drives the overall score, ChatGPT comes out ahead. The tier gap is repeatable -- not methodology noise -- and the day-to-day experience reflects it.
On pricing, ChatGPT starts free while Devin requires a paid plan from day one ($20+). If you're testing the waters or running an occasional workload, that gap matters more than the score differential. Devin starts at $20; ChatGPT starts at $0. Compare what each entry tier actually unlocks before you compare list prices -- the limits matter more than the headline number.
By use case: pick Devin when development teams that want to offload well-scoped tasks like bug fixes, test writing, and boilerplate code to an autonomous agent. Pick ChatGPT when everyone. The two tools aren't fighting for the same person -- they're aiming at adjacent jobs that occasionally overlap. If you're squarely in ChatGPT's lane, the tier-list ranking and the use-case fit point the same direction; if you're in Devin's lane, the score gap matters less than the fit.
Bottom line: ChatGPT is the better tool for most people right now. Pick Devin only when development teams that want to offload well-scoped tasks like bug fixes, test writing, and boilerplate code to an autonomous agent -- that's its lane, and inside that lane it still earns its place.
Keep digging
Compare more & explore
Built from our daily AI-tool sweep, last touched May 19, 2026. Honest tier-list reviews — no affiliate-link pieces disguised as advice. See the rubric or how we review.