Devin vs Augment Code Intent

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Devin

B
7.4/10

The most autonomous AI coding agent -- Devin 2.2 (Feb 24 2026) adds desktop/GUI testing (Figma, browser automation), Devin Review (pull-request analysis catching ~30% more issues), and ~3x faster startup (~15s vs ~45s). Now embedded in Windsurf 2.0

Powered by Cognition proprietary orchestration over Claude / GPT / Gemini + Devin's own tuned components

Our Pick

Augment Code Intent

A
8.0/10

Spec-driven multi-agent orchestration for code -- coordinator + implementor agents in isolated git worktrees + verifier. Works with Augment's Auggie, Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode. Public beta 2026-02-10

CategoryDevinAugment Code Intent
Ease of Use6.57.0
Output Quality8.08.0
Value7.08.0
Features8.09.0
Overall7.48.0

Pricing Comparison

FeatureDevinAugment Code Intent
Free TierNoNo
Starting Price$20Included in Auggie subscription

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Devin if...

Development teams that want to offload well-scoped tasks like bug fixes, test writing, and boilerplate code to an autonomous agent. Best when the task description is detailed and specific.

Visit Devin

Pick Augment Code Intent if...

  • ✓Better value for money (8/10)
  • ✓More features (9 vs 8)

Engineering teams already using Augment Code's Auggie or running mixed Claude-Code + Codex workflows who want higher-level orchestration than writing LangGraph graphs from scratch. Also teams that want git-worktree-isolated parallel agent work with a verifier in the loop.

Visit Augment Code Intent

Our Verdict

Augment Code Intent edges out Devin with a 8.0 vs 7.4 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Augment Code Intent has the advantage in value.