Cohere Command A vs MiniMax M2 / M2.5

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Cohere Command A

B
7.5/10

Cohere's enterprise-multilingual flagship -- 111B params, 256K context, runs on 2x H100. 23 languages. CC-BY-NC 4.0 on weights (research / non-commercial), commercial requires Cohere enterprise contract. Follow-ups: Command A Reasoning + Command A Vision

Our Pick

MiniMax M2 / M2.5

A
8.4/10

MiniMax's open-weights frontier -- first open model to match Claude Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench at 10-20× lower cost

CategoryCohere Command AMiniMax M2 / M2.5
Ease of Use6.56.5
Output Quality8.59.0
Value7.09.5
Features8.08.5
Overall7.58.4

Pricing Comparison

FeatureCohere Command AMiniMax M2 / M2.5
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

MiniMax M2.5 (230B/10B active MoE) benchmarks — Cohere Command A has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
MMLU-Pro82.1%
GPQA Diamond76.8%
SWE-Bench Verified80.2%
HumanEval91%
AIME 202585.3%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Cohere Command A if...

Mid-size to large enterprises needing a multilingual open-weight model with low-ish infrastructure requirements (2x H100 for full model). Especially good for retrieval-augmented generation over internal document stores, multi-language customer support, and workflows touching Asian / Middle Eastern / African languages where Command A's coverage materially beats Llama or Mistral. Also a strong pick for teams already in Cohere's enterprise ecosystem.

Visit Cohere Command A

Pick MiniMax M2 / M2.5 if...

  • Better value for money (9.5/10)

Agentic coding and tool-use workflows on a budget. Best price-to-SWE-Bench ratio of any open-weights model in 2026.

Visit MiniMax M2 / M2.5

Our Verdict

MiniMax M2 / M2.5 edges out Cohere Command A with a 8.4 vs 7.5 overall score. Both are solid picks, but MiniMax M2 / M2.5 has the advantage in output quality.