Cohere Command A vs Google Antigravity
Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.
Cohere Command A
Cohere's enterprise-multilingual flagship -- 111B params, 256K context, runs on 2x H100. 23 languages. CC-BY-NC 4.0 on weights (research / non-commercial), commercial requires Cohere enterprise contract. Follow-ups: Command A Reasoning + Command A Vision
Google Antigravity
Google's agent-first AI IDE -- deploys up to 5 autonomous coding agents in parallel on a VS Code fork
Powered by Gemini 3.1 Pro / Claude Opus 4.6 / GPT-OSS 120B (multi-model)
| Category | Cohere Command A | Google Antigravity |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 6.5 | 8.0 |
| Output Quality | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Value | 7.0 | 6.0 |
| Features | 8.0 | 9.5 |
| Overall | 7.5 | 8.0 |
Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Cohere Command A | Google Antigravity |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | $0 | $0 |
Which Should You Pick?
Pick Cohere Command A if...
- ✓Better value for money (7/10)
Mid-size to large enterprises needing a multilingual open-weight model with low-ish infrastructure requirements (2x H100 for full model). Especially good for retrieval-augmented generation over internal document stores, multi-language customer support, and workflows touching Asian / Middle Eastern / African languages where Command A's coverage materially beats Llama or Mistral. Also a strong pick for teams already in Cohere's enterprise ecosystem.
Visit Cohere Command APick Google Antigravity if...
- ✓Easier to use (8 vs 6.5)
- ✓More features (9.5 vs 8)
Developers working on large, multi-file projects who want to parallelize their workflow. If you regularly work on 3-5 tasks simultaneously (fix a bug, add a feature, write tests, refactor), Antigravity's multi-agent architecture is unmatched.
Visit Google AntigravityOur Verdict
Google Antigravity edges out Cohere Command A with a 8.0 vs 7.5 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Google Antigravity has the advantage in features.