Cohere Transcribe vs Lyria 3 Pro (Google)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

Cohere Transcribe

A
8.0/10

Cohere's first audio model -- launched 2026-03-26 under Apache 2.0, 2B parameters, #1 on Hugging Face Open ASR Leaderboard (5.42 avg WER), 14 enterprise-critical languages. Free API with rate limits; Model Vault for production

Lyria 3 Pro (Google)

B
7.8/10

Google DeepMind's music generation model -- 3-minute structured songs with intro, verse, chorus, and outro control

CategoryCohere TranscribeLyria 3 Pro (Google)
Ease of Use7.08.0
Output Quality9.08.0
Value9.07.0
Features7.08.0
Overall8.07.8

Pricing Comparison

FeatureCohere TranscribeLyria 3 Pro (Google)
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Cohere Transcribe if...

  • Higher output quality (9 vs 8)
  • Better value for money (9/10)

Enterprise teams transcribing English, European, and major APAC languages at scale who want open weights they can self-host, fine-tune, or deploy on-prem. The Apache 2.0 license removes a major procurement blocker compared to proprietary ASR, and the accuracy tier is now best-in-class for open models.

Visit Cohere Transcribe

Pick Lyria 3 Pro (Google) if...

  • Easier to use (8 vs 7)
  • More features (8 vs 7)

Content creators who already pay for a Gemini or Google AI subscription and want longer, more structured AI music. Also great for developers building music features into their own apps via the $0.08/song API.

Visit Lyria 3 Pro (Google)

Our Verdict

Cohere Transcribe and Lyria 3 Pro (Google) are extremely close overall. Your choice comes down to specific needs -- Cohere Transcribe is better for enterprise teams transcribing english, european, and major apac languages at scale who want open weights they can self-host, fine-tune, or deploy on-prem, while Lyria 3 Pro (Google) works best for content creators who already pay for a gemini or google ai subscription and want longer, more structured ai music.