Cohere Transcribe vs Figma AI
Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.
Cohere Transcribe
Cohere's first audio model -- launched 2026-03-26 under Apache 2.0, 2B parameters, #1 on Hugging Face Open ASR Leaderboard (5.42 avg WER), 14 enterprise-critical languages. Free API with rate limits; Model Vault for production
Figma AI
AI features baked into the design tool everyone already uses -- useful shortcuts, not a design replacement
| Category | Cohere Transcribe | Figma AI |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| Output Quality | 9.0 | 6.0 |
| Value | 9.0 | 7.0 |
| Features | 7.0 | 6.0 |
| Overall | 8.0 | 6.8 |
Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Cohere Transcribe | Figma AI |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | $0 | $0 |
Which Should You Pick?
Pick Cohere Transcribe if...
- ✓Higher output quality (9 vs 6)
- ✓Better value for money (9/10)
- ✓More features (7 vs 6)
Enterprise teams transcribing English, European, and major APAC languages at scale who want open weights they can self-host, fine-tune, or deploy on-prem. The Apache 2.0 license removes a major procurement blocker compared to proprietary ASR, and the accuracy tier is now best-in-class for open models.
Visit Cohere TranscribePick Figma AI if...
- ✓Easier to use (8 vs 7)
Existing Figma users who want small AI-powered productivity boosts without changing their workflow.
Visit Figma AIOur Verdict
Cohere Transcribe is the clear winner here with 8.0/10 vs 6.8/10. Figma AI isn't bad, but Cohere Transcribe outperforms it across the board. Pick Figma AI only if existing figma users who want small ai-powered productivity boosts without changing their workflow.