Codex (OpenAI) vs Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Our Pick

Codex (OpenAI)

A
8.3/10

OpenAI's cloud-based coding agent -- runs parallel tasks, proposes PRs, and lives inside ChatGPT

Powered by GPT-5.3-Codex / GPT-5.4

Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1

B
7.9/10

Microsoft's first in-house speech-recognition model -- launched 2026-04-02. #1 on FLEURS WER overall, #1 by FLEURS WER in 11 of the top 25 global languages. Beats Whisper-large-v3, Scribe v2, GPT-Transcribe, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite. $0.36/hour of audio on Azure Foundry

CategoryCodex (OpenAI)Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1
Ease of Use8.06.0
Output Quality8.09.5
Value8.09.0
Features9.07.0
Overall8.37.9

Pricing Comparison

FeatureCodex (OpenAI)Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1
Free TierYesYes
Starting Price$0$0.36

Benchmark Head-to-Head

GPT-5.3-Codex benchmarks — Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1 has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
SWE-bench72%
HumanEval95%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Codex (OpenAI) if...

  • Easier to use (8 vs 6)
  • More features (9 vs 7)

Developers already paying for ChatGPT Plus who want a coding agent at no extra cost. Especially good for parallel task execution -- assign multiple bug fixes or feature branches and let Codex work them simultaneously.

Visit Codex (OpenAI)

Pick Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1 if...

  • Higher output quality (9.5 vs 8)
  • Better value for money (9/10)

Developers and enterprises who need best-in-class multilingual speech-to-text for high-volume use cases (meeting recording pipelines, call-center transcription, accessibility captioning at scale, multilingual audio indexing). Especially relevant for Azure shops already on Microsoft infrastructure.

Visit Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1

Our Verdict

Codex (OpenAI) edges out Microsoft MAI-Transcribe-1 with a 8.3 vs 7.9 overall score. Both are solid picks, but Codex (OpenAI) has the advantage in features.