Claude Mythos Preview vs Codex (OpenAI)

Which one should you pick? Here's the full breakdown.

Claude Mythos Preview

C
6.5/10

Anthropic's most capable model -- a gated research preview via Project Glasswing, cybersecurity-specialized. 73% success on expert CTF tasks, 32-step autonomous network attacks. Not generally available.

Our Pick

Codex (OpenAI)

A
8.3/10

OpenAI's cloud-based coding agent -- runs parallel tasks, proposes PRs, and lives inside ChatGPT

Powered by GPT-5.3-Codex / GPT-5.4

CategoryClaude Mythos PreviewCodex (OpenAI)
Ease of Use2.08.0
Output Quality10.08.0
Value5.08.0
Features9.09.0
Overall6.58.3

Pricing Comparison

FeatureClaude Mythos PreviewCodex (OpenAI)
Free TierNoYes
Starting PriceInvite only$0

Benchmark Head-to-Head

GPT-5.3-Codex benchmarks — Claude Mythos Preview has no published benchmarks

BenchmarkScore
SWE-bench72%
HumanEval95%

Which Should You Pick?

Pick Claude Mythos Preview if...

  • Higher output quality (10 vs 8)

Partner organizations in Project Glasswing doing cybersecurity research, defensive red-teaming, threat intelligence, or large-scale vulnerability triage. If your use case is legitimate cybersecurity and you have enterprise Anthropic contact, ask about Glasswing admission.

Visit Claude Mythos Preview

Pick Codex (OpenAI) if...

  • Easier to use (8 vs 2)
  • Better value for money (8/10)
  • Has a free tier

Developers already paying for ChatGPT Plus who want a coding agent at no extra cost. Especially good for parallel task execution -- assign multiple bug fixes or feature branches and let Codex work them simultaneously.

Visit Codex (OpenAI)

Our Verdict

Codex (OpenAI) is the clear winner here with 8.3/10 vs 6.5/10. Claude Mythos Preview isn't bad, but Codex (OpenAI) outperforms it across the board. Pick Claude Mythos Preview only if partner organizations in project glasswing doing cybersecurity research, defensive red-teaming, threat intelligence, or large-scale vulnerability triage.